What is minimum participation?
Insurance companies have a minimum participation requirement for various reasons. One of the primary reasons is to prevent an employer from selecting which employees can join the plan and only offering coverage to those employees with health conditions, or from taking advantage of carve-out options that have different underwriting guidelines. Since small group health insurance is guaranteed issue, the insurance companies want to insure as many of the eligible employees as possible, which reduces their overall risk in paying claims toward this group by requiring even the healthy employees to partake in joining the employer-sponsored health plan. If an employer is not paying the entire employee premium, there are bound to be a certain percentage of employees that do not want the health insurance because they can’t afford, or can’t justify the additional personal expense. This attitude is more common amongst the healthy employees who are not in need of health care and are less likely to consider medical insurance as a necessary expense. In determining minimum participation percentages, the insurance companies will not consider employees that have other health insurance coverage available to them, either through another employer or the employer of a spouse. Although these persons are considered eligible employees, they are excluded from the minimum participation equation. If the employer offers group health insurance through more than one insurance carrier, these insurance carriers are not able to request the standard 75% participation, so they make adjustments accordingly. They may require a minimum number of employees enroll with them, or a lesser percentage, such as 50%. Minimum percentage requirements may also be affected by the type of health plan that they employer has chosen for the group. 4 CommentsLeave a comment |
|
Hi, I work with a church in Virginia and we would like to offer group insurance to the entire congregation, that would mean all the people who are members of our church. Of course the members would have to pay their portion of the group insurance, but can our church offer them group insurance? We do not currently have any other group health insurance for our staff even. Could we do it by hiring members of the church as part-time employees and then get a health coverage plan for our employees full time and part time?
Comment by Sam — June 25, 2009 @ 12:39 am
The answer would be no. In order to have group health insurance individuals must be employees. This would be verified through quarterly payroll reports. Since the congregation members are not paid, they cannot be in a group.
Comment by Paul — July 1, 2009 @ 7:04 am
Hello
I am new equity trader with a pre-existing health condition. I currently have COBRA, but it is due to run out at the end of the year. The firm that I trade with does not offer health insurance.
Is it possible for me to form my own one person company and offer group coverage to it\’s sole employee (namely me)? I’m quite sure I could guaranty 100% participation.
If not, what are my options? As the end of the year approaches, I’m getting very nervous about the possibility of having no health insurance.
Comment by Very Nervous — August 11, 2009 @ 1:39 am
The guidelines for establishing a “group of one” health insurance policy varies by state, as do the options availability to you for guaranteed issue health insurance once your COBRA has expired.
In which state do you reside?
Comment by Moderator — August 11, 2009 @ 7:07 am